Executive Chairs

A. The Constitution says nothing about executive agreements B. The Constitution says that executive agreements under the treaty, but does not require Senate confirmation C. The Constitution says the president can negotiate executive agreements in all areas except those expressly prohibited by Congress D. The Constitution requires Senate confirmation of executive agreements also need help with this one.Assume the balance of advantage in the Senate is 55 Republicans and 45 Democrats. Which of the following people would be a Democrat? A. The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee B. Senate Majority Leader Senate Minority Leader head of CD of the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. I think the answer is C. The leader of the minority, but I'm not sure.anyone? At first I wrote both of C. But I think the first question, the answer is A, because the Constitution refers only to explicit agreements. Missouri v. Netherlands and the series of cases involving so-called executive agreements and the Constitution has no such agreements, similar agreements that A and C are my answers to speak. This is definitely the answer to the second question. The Constitution says nothing about direction agreements.that I think is something created by the President as the various agencies have been created (eg, CIA, FBI) are ways to get to the various agencies and your acidify Missouri v question.C second act . Holland has nothing to do with management agreements.that was a case of migratory birds contract was Act.it consulting Missouri, on the basis of the tenth Amendment.dont this guy challeneged first A, C 2 is close to the power or right, he had to invade Iraq? Under the Geneva Convention and UN conventions we are all Americans against him as he blatantly ignored them and again threw us as Americans back to the pool and disrepectfull the most hated people on the planet.